This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Would be really nice to get a picture for this. Can't find a picture that isn't copywrited useing google. I'm going to put in an image request.
--Banana04131 20:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Both display fine for me, both as thumbnail and full size. I opened the first one with Photoshop: no problems, no complaints. —EncMstr 03:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do we have a page for the classification of waterfalls? ie. What's Class Three mean? EvilCouch 07:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good question. Some of the original text of this article was copied-and-pasted from the waterfallsnorthwest.com site, so it's probably their rating system that was used. Katr67 12:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That makes sense. Any idea if anyone else uses the same rating scheme that we could generate a section in waterfall or if this is an orphaned concept that would be better removed? EvilCouch 13:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
According to this, the "BWR" looks like a fairly recent system made up by one person and not yet published. I'd say leave it out. Looking over a variety of other waterfall articles doesn't reveal any other usable rating system. Instead, I'd suggest adding an infobox: Template:Infobox Waterfall. Katr67 14:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Works for me. I pulled the reference from the article. EvilCouch 06:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]